Re: use of w3c logo, did-doge

st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:57 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> napsal:

> That method spec is hosted on another organization's GitHub and is not to
> my knowledge a CCG work item
>

It was on the official agenda of the CCG telecon:

"Mike Prorock will share his famous Verifiable Credential for his rooster
and Wayne Chang will share DID dogecoin"

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2021May/0167.html

At a minimum it has been promoted here, by the previous chair, and
continues to feature, and be part of discussions, including yesterday on
the mailing list.


>
> Mike Prorock
> mesur.io
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 06:52 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:39 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> napsal:
>>
>>> Regular W3C logo unaltered is fine as long as it is on a community group
>>> draft respec template, or used in a manner that lines up with the usage
>>> link I sent.
>>>
>>
>> Thank you.  I am using respec.  It looks like if you remove the logo
>> field altogether, by default, the W3C logo appears.  So I've done that.
>>
>> What about the use of the "W3D" (D=Doge) logo in this group?  It is
>> concerning.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Mike Prorock
>>> mesur.io
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 06:30 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:27 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io>
>>>> napsal:
>>>>
>>>>> Chair hat on... I would put this squarely in the frowned upon area -
>>>>> obviously check with legal on your side.  See:
>>>>> https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/logo-usage-20000308#faq-logo-change
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What does "frowned upon" mean (chair hat on)?  This was done by the
>>>> previous chair, wasnt it?
>>>>
>>>> My personal question is whether I can put the regular w3c logo on a did
>>>> method draft that I am working on.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike Prorock
>>>>> mesur.io
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 02:46 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I noticed in the previous that the w3c logo was altered, with the "c"
>>>>>> changed to a "d" for doge
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://spruceid.github.io/did-doge/docs/w3d.png
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm in the process of creating a did draft, and I was wondering to
>>>>>> what extent the w3c logo can be reused, an in which context
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can w3c logo be used in community group drafts, or must it first be
>>>>>> in the registry?  Can it be altered etc?
>>>>>>
>>>>>