- From: Wayne Chang <wayne@spruceid.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 22:40:01 -0400
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io>, W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFTzAXiZ2dSq7a9dZ29uk6yiH7WqJ3bYEE=yAGVbFZkjz1Fj=w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, here is a Wikipedia link to the definition of a derivative work. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_work If anyone seeks to contend that the image in question is not a derivative work and/or causes harm, please let me know and we can go from there. Best, - Wayne On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 09:03 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:57 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> napsal: > >> That method spec is hosted on another organization's GitHub and is not to >> my knowledge a CCG work item >> > > It was on the official agenda of the CCG telecon: > > "Mike Prorock will share his famous Verifiable Credential for his rooster > and Wayne Chang will share DID dogecoin" > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2021May/0167.html > > At a minimum it has been promoted here, by the previous chair, and > continues to feature, and be part of discussions, including yesterday on > the mailing list. > > >> >> Mike Prorock >> mesur.io >> >> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 06:52 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:39 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> >>> napsal: >>> >>>> Regular W3C logo unaltered is fine as long as it is on a community >>>> group draft respec template, or used in a manner that lines up with the >>>> usage link I sent. >>>> >>> >>> Thank you. I am using respec. It looks like if you remove the logo >>> field altogether, by default, the W3C logo appears. So I've done that. >>> >>> What about the use of the "W3D" (D=Doge) logo in this group? It is >>> concerning. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Mike Prorock >>>> mesur.io >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 06:30 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:27 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> >>>>> napsal: >>>>> >>>>>> Chair hat on... I would put this squarely in the frowned upon area - >>>>>> obviously check with legal on your side. See: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/logo-usage-20000308#faq-logo-change >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What does "frowned upon" mean (chair hat on)? This was done by the >>>>> previous chair, wasnt it? >>>>> >>>>> My personal question is whether I can put the regular w3c logo on a >>>>> did method draft that I am working on. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Mike Prorock >>>>>> mesur.io >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 02:46 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I noticed in the previous that the w3c logo was altered, with the >>>>>>> "c" changed to a "d" for doge >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://spruceid.github.io/did-doge/docs/w3d.png >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm in the process of creating a did draft, and I was wondering to >>>>>>> what extent the w3c logo can be reused, an in which context >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can w3c logo be used in community group drafts, or must it first be >>>>>>> in the registry? Can it be altered etc? >>>>>>> >>>>>>
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2023 02:40:17 UTC