Re: use of w3c logo, did-doge

That method spec is hosted on another organization's GitHub and is not to
my knowledge a CCG work item

Mike Prorock
mesur.io

On Wed, May 3, 2023, 06:52 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:39 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> napsal:
>
>> Regular W3C logo unaltered is fine as long as it is on a community group
>> draft respec template, or used in a manner that lines up with the usage
>> link I sent.
>>
>
> Thank you.  I am using respec.  It looks like if you remove the logo field
> altogether, by default, the W3C logo appears.  So I've done that.
>
> What about the use of the "W3D" (D=Doge) logo in this group?  It is
> concerning.
>
>
>>
>> Mike Prorock
>> mesur.io
>>
>> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 06:30 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> st 3. 5. 2023 v 14:27 odesílatel Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io>
>>> napsal:
>>>
>>>> Chair hat on... I would put this squarely in the frowned upon area -
>>>> obviously check with legal on your side.  See:
>>>> https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/logo-usage-20000308#faq-logo-change
>>>>
>>>
>>> What does "frowned upon" mean (chair hat on)?  This was done by the
>>> previous chair, wasnt it?
>>>
>>> My personal question is whether I can put the regular w3c logo on a did
>>> method draft that I am working on.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mike Prorock
>>>> mesur.io
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 02:46 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I noticed in the previous that the w3c logo was altered, with the "c"
>>>>> changed to a "d" for doge
>>>>>
>>>>> https://spruceid.github.io/did-doge/docs/w3d.png
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm in the process of creating a did draft, and I was wondering to
>>>>> what extent the w3c logo can be reused, an in which context
>>>>>
>>>>> Can w3c logo be used in community group drafts, or must it first be in
>>>>> the registry?  Can it be altered etc?
>>>>>
>>>>