- From: Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 21:50:59 -0500
- Cc: W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANYRo8h6xukqfw990apsOrtbMvTV5U+-AZVcFjd21TgAkMk22A@mail.gmail.com>
CCG rules require two leads for the work item. Ideally, the two people structuring the work item should both represent implementers and I could continue to play my advisor role. If there aren't two separate people in CCG that are concerned about the burdens of standardized digital credentials and/or the relationship to biometrics in DIDs and VCs, then pushing a work item seems pointless. Adrian On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 7:26 PM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 1/18/22 7:04 PM, Adrian Gropper wrote: > > Are we debating about the burdens? Are there other mitigations we should > > consider relative to the burdens? Where are we to discuss the burden of > > standardized digital credentials and then the possible mitigations? > > Adrian, I expect that you'll find asking vague questions will result in > vague > answers (and frustration). > > From what I recall, you signed up to do a work item to explore this topic. > Have you been able to make progress on writing up your thoughts on the > matter > for those interested in this group to analyse? > > The questions you're asking should probably go in that work item on > delegation > that you proposed. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021) > https://www.digitalbazaar.com/ > > >
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2022 02:51:23 UTC