Re: W3C Credentials CG Call Tues: mobile DL deck

Pay-for standards should have no role in SSI because they are inaccessible
to community-supported F/OSS.

IEEE has tried to split this baby with their privacy-inflected 7000 series.
It’s a potential solution for ISO. As it stands, ISO collaboration seems
like a good way for W3C and IETF to lose our way.

- Adrian

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 3:11 PM Jim St.Clair <jim.stclair@lumedic.io> wrote:

> “+100
> Pay-for-standards was a great idea..twenty years ago.”
> …yeah, except we’re sitting here realizing our standard is being displaced
> by this new standard using the 20 year old model, so….
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jim
>
> *_______________*
>
> [image: Image]
>
> *Jim St.Clair *
>
> Chief Trust Officer
>
> jim.stclair@lumedic.io | 228-273-4893
>
> *Let’s meet to discuss patient identity exchange*:
> https://calendly.com/jim-stclair-1
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, October 8, 2021 1:00:12 PM
> *To:* dzagidulin@gmail.com <dzagidulin@gmail.com>; Credentials Community
> Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: W3C Credentials CG Call Tues: mobile DL deck
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
> On 2021-10-08 19:46, Dmitri Zagidulin wrote:
> > David Chadwick wrote:
> >
> >  > At the same time I advised the W3C VC WG about mDL and suggested that
> we could utilise their well developed protocols as we had none. But again
> that request fell on deaf ears.
> >
> > I suspect part of the issue here is just culture clash. All of us (most
> of us?) want as much wide interop as possible, and to respect prior art.
> However, for any given W3C WG member, the idea of paying $200 or whatever
> it is to just LOOK at the ISO spec... that's a hard sell.
>
> +100
> Pay-for-standards was a great idea..twenty years ago.
>
> Anders
>
> > Dmitri
>
>
>
>