“+100 Pay-for-standards was a great idea..twenty years ago.” …yeah, except we’re sitting here realizing our standard is being displaced by this new standard using the 20 year old model, so…. Best regards, Jim _______________ [Image] Jim St.Clair Chief Trust Officer jim.stclair@lumedic.io<mailto:jim.stclair@lumedic.io> | 228-273-4893<tel:228-273-4893> Let’s meet to discuss patient identity exchange: https://calendly.com/jim-stclair-1 ________________________________ From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 1:00:12 PM To: dzagidulin@gmail.com <dzagidulin@gmail.com>; Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org> Subject: Re: W3C Credentials CG Call Tues: mobile DL deck CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. On 2021-10-08 19:46, Dmitri Zagidulin wrote: > David Chadwick wrote: > > > At the same time I advised the W3C VC WG about mDL and suggested that we could utilise their well developed protocols as we had none. But again that request fell on deaf ears. > > I suspect part of the issue here is just culture clash. All of us (most of us?) want as much wide interop as possible, and to respect prior art. However, for any given W3C WG member, the idea of paying $200 or whatever it is to just LOOK at the ISO spec... that's a hard sell. +100 Pay-for-standards was a great idea..twenty years ago. Anders > DmitriReceived on Friday, 8 October 2021 19:09:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:25:23 UTC