W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > October 2021

Re: W3C Credentials CG Call Tues: mobile DL deck

From: Jim St.Clair <jim.stclair@lumedic.io>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 19:09:43 +0000
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, "dzagidulin@gmail.com" <dzagidulin@gmail.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Message-ID: <SJ0PR04MB716722113F4AE631046D40E59FB29@SJ0PR04MB7167.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Pay-for-standards was a great idea..twenty years ago.”
…yeah, except we’re sitting here realizing our standard is being displaced by this new standard using the 20 year old model, so….

Best regards,




Jim St.Clair

Chief Trust Officer

jim.stclair@lumedic.io<mailto:jim.stclair@lumedic.io> | 228-273-4893<tel:228-273-4893>

Let’s meet to discuss patient identity exchange: https://calendly.com/jim-stclair-1

From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 1:00:12 PM
To: dzagidulin@gmail.com <dzagidulin@gmail.com>; Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Subject: Re: W3C Credentials CG Call Tues: mobile DL deck

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

On 2021-10-08 19:46, Dmitri Zagidulin wrote:
> David Chadwick wrote:
>  > At the same time I advised the W3C VC WG about mDL and suggested that we could utilise their well developed protocols as we had none. But again that request fell on deaf ears.
> I suspect part of the issue here is just culture clash. All of us (most of us?) want as much wide interop as possible, and to respect prior art. However, for any given W3C WG member, the idea of paying $200 or whatever it is to just LOOK at the ISO spec... that's a hard sell.

Pay-for-standards was a great idea..twenty years ago.


> Dmitri
Received on Friday, 8 October 2021 19:09:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:25:23 UTC