W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > October 2021

RE: W3C Credentials CG Call Tues: mobile DL deck

From: Jim St.Clair <jim.stclair@lumedic.io>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 21:37:29 +0000
To: Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>
CC: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, "dzagidulin@gmail.com" <dzagidulin@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <SJ0PR04MB716751D9A016AFE6C9A54B459FB29@SJ0PR04MB7167.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
“As it stands, ISO collaboration seems like a good way for W3C and IETF to lose our way. “
…or get left behind. It’s up to the community to decide.

Best regards,
Jim
_______________
[cid:image001.png@01D7BC62.C717C680]
Jim St.Clair
Chief Trust Officer
jim.stclair@lumedic.io<mailto:jim.stclair@lumedic.io> | 228-273-4893
Let’s meet to discuss patient identity exchange: https://calendly.com/jim-stclair-1


From: Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 3:58 PM
To: Jim St.Clair <jim.stclair@lumedic.io>
Cc: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>; Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>; dzagidulin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: W3C Credentials CG Call Tues: mobile DL deck

Pay-for standards should have no role in SSI because they are inaccessible to community-supported F/OSS.

IEEE has tried to split this baby with their privacy-inflected 7000 series. It’s a potential solution for ISO. As it stands, ISO collaboration seems like a good way for W3C and IETF to lose our way.

- Adrian

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 3:11 PM Jim St.Clair <jim.stclair@lumedic.io<mailto:jim.stclair@lumedic.io>> wrote:
“+100
Pay-for-standards was a great idea..twenty years ago.”
…yeah, except we’re sitting here realizing our standard is being displaced by this new standard using the 20 year old model, so….


Best regards,

Jim

_______________



Jim St.Clair

Chief Trust Officer

jim.stclair@lumedic.io<mailto:jim.stclair@lumedic.io> | 228-273-4893<tel:228-273-4893>

Let’s meet to discuss patient identity exchange: https://calendly.com/jim-stclair-1


________________________________
From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com<mailto:anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 1:00:12 PM
To: dzagidulin@gmail.com<mailto:dzagidulin@gmail.com> <dzagidulin@gmail.com<mailto:dzagidulin@gmail.com>>; Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org<mailto:public-credentials@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: W3C Credentials CG Call Tues: mobile DL deck

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


On 2021-10-08 19:46, Dmitri Zagidulin wrote:
> David Chadwick wrote:
>
>  > At the same time I advised the W3C VC WG about mDL and suggested that we could utilise their well developed protocols as we had none. But again that request fell on deaf ears.
>
> I suspect part of the issue here is just culture clash. All of us (most of us?) want as much wide interop as possible, and to respect prior art. However, for any given W3C WG member, the idea of paying $200 or whatever it is to just LOOK at the ISO spec... that's a hard sell.

+100
Pay-for-standards was a great idea..twenty years ago.

Anders

> Dmitri


image001.png
(image/png attachment: image001.png)

Received on Friday, 8 October 2021 21:38:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 8 October 2021 21:38:02 UTC