Re: W3C Credentials CG Call Tues: mobile DL deck

I’m curious. For the not “pay-for-standards” - where does the money come
from?
Because someone is paying for the collaborative work spaces…

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:01 PM Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>
wrote:

> Pay-for standards should have no role in SSI because they are inaccessible
> to community-supported F/OSS.
>
> IEEE has tried to split this baby with their privacy-inflected 7000
> series. It’s a potential solution for ISO. As it stands, ISO collaboration
> seems like a good way for W3C and IETF to lose our way.
>
> - Adrian
>
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 3:11 PM Jim St.Clair <jim.stclair@lumedic.io>
> wrote:
>
>> “+100
>> Pay-for-standards was a great idea..twenty years ago.”
>> …yeah, except we’re sitting here realizing our standard is being
>> displaced by this new standard using the 20 year old model, so….
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> *_______________*
>>
>> [image: Image]
>>
>> *Jim St.Clair *
>>
>> Chief Trust Officer
>>
>> jim.stclair@lumedic.io | 228-273-4893
>>
>> *Let’s meet to discuss patient identity exchange*:
>> https://calendly.com/jim-stclair-1
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Friday, October 8, 2021 1:00:12 PM
>> *To:* dzagidulin@gmail.com <dzagidulin@gmail.com>; Credentials Community
>> Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: W3C Credentials CG Call Tues: mobile DL deck
>>
>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
>> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
>> the content is safe.
>>
>>
>> On 2021-10-08 19:46, Dmitri Zagidulin wrote:
>> > David Chadwick wrote:
>> >
>> >  > At the same time I advised the W3C VC WG about mDL and suggested
>> that we could utilise their well developed protocols as we had none. But
>> again that request fell on deaf ears.
>> >
>> > I suspect part of the issue here is just culture clash. All of us (most
>> of us?) want as much wide interop as possible, and to respect prior art.
>> However, for any given W3C WG member, the idea of paying $200 or whatever
>> it is to just LOOK at the ISO spec... that's a hard sell.
>>
>> +100
>> Pay-for-standards was a great idea..twenty years ago.
>>
>> Anders
>>
>> > Dmitri
>>
>>
>>
>> --
Andrew Hughes CISM CISSP
In Turn Information Management Consulting
o  +1 650.209.7542 m +1 250.888.9474
5043 Del Monte Ave,, Victoria, BC V8Y 1W9
AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-hughes-682058a
Digital Identity | International Standards | Information Security