W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > July 2021

Re: VC-HTTP API Use Case for Audit / Notary

From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 18:17:49 +0000
To: Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
CC: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
Message-ID: <MN2PR02MB69927C7757A008D2DDC84BA3CD1B9@MN2PR02MB6992.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
I’ll also +1 this…

And then point out that notarization is completely different than then audit idea being expressed here, and comes on a very specific set of laws in most parts of the world.

Leonard

From: Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io>
Date: Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 10:44 AM
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
Subject: Re: VC-HTTP API Use Case for Audit / Notary
I strongly suggest that we put it out of scope for the VC HTTP API for at
least the next 6-9 months.
+1

Audit functionality is hugely important, but with current scope and state of VC-HTTP-API I am not seeing it as something that we would want to tackle as part of base VC-HTTP-API implementations on the mesur.io<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmesur.io%2F&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7Ca0c1132566504c89981708d9408c7c8b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637611794466271954%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=kWLehalqirAF552gv39UhY6uCVe3P5cBbRz9ZGzET3w%3D&reserved=0> side for now.

Mike Prorock
CTO, Founder
https://mesur.io/<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmesur.io%2F&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7Ca0c1132566504c89981708d9408c7c8b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637611794466271954%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=crxXNEo93mjRRny94GLdF7UNw1uEO7klmUnIhCrZ4vM%3D&reserved=0>



On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:36 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com<mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote:
On 7/3/21 6:13 PM, Adrian Gropper wrote:
> Audit should be in scope as we work on VC-related protocols.

Yes, audit should be a consideration in the VC ecosystem.

However, the diagram you provided doesn't seem to touch the VC HTTP API at
all. Audit seems like it has nothing to do with the VC HTTP API at present,
and we should keep it out of scope until we have the base layer of the API
handled.

It's going to be very difficult to argue that auditing is as foundational as
issuing, holding, or verifying.

I strongly suggest that we put it out of scope for the VC HTTP API for at
least the next 6-9 months.

-- manu

--
Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fmanusporny%2F&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7Ca0c1132566504c89981708d9408c7c8b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637611794466281911%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=gyQrfQXJucRbJbnpU42G5CULip7jmmHQUNJNzttapH8%3D&reserved=0>
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021)
https://www.digitalbazaar.com/<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitalbazaar.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7Ca0c1132566504c89981708d9408c7c8b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637611794466281911%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=BLsjCPeL%2FmdoHItgQiktYq2ZE5wPlL2vyPw7TGpptsQ%3D&reserved=0>
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2021 18:18:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 6 July 2021 18:18:07 UTC