- From: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:14:07 -0500
- To: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACvcBVrV+FLiVWQyEC4_-Gs9-M6TE+SBHKobDPrsKEGSChAUbA@mail.gmail.com>
I am not sure this helps, but is there a place somewhere where all of this is being/or will be cataloged and organized? There is a thread with some details from October 16th: Connectivity issues last Tuesday < https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2020Oct/0046.html> 22 days ago here: Jitsi status < https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/157> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:57 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 10/26/20 2:31 PM, Heather Vescent wrote: > > For me, this is about practicality and accessibility, not technological > > fundamentalism. It's about enabling the chairs and the community to most > > effectively make positive change in the future of credentials, wallets, > > DIDs, VCs, SSI, e.g. the topic at hand. > > If folks want to see what a Zoom-based future looks like, you only have > to look at how the DIF SDS WG's transcripts and recordings are going: > > Entire meetings missing transcripts, no transcripts being sent to W3C > CCG mailing list (a joint partner in that work effort): > > https://lists.identity.foundation/g/sds-wg/wiki/23488 > https://lists.identity.foundation/g/sds-wg/wiki/23489 > https://lists.identity.foundation/g/sds-wg/wiki/23480 > https://lists.identity.foundation/g/sds-wg/wiki/23011 > https://lists.identity.foundation/g/sds-wg/wiki/22693 > > Entire meeting recordings and transcripts missing: > > https://lists.identity.foundation/g/sds-wg/wiki/23066 > https://lists.identity.foundation/g/sds-wg/wiki/22687 > > ... and all of those recordings and transcripts are on proprietary > infrastructure that could disappear tomorrow (no backups). > > That is no way to build an open standard. > > To be clear, I'm not throwing shade at the DIF SDS WG Chairs or DIF... > they're doing their best with what they have. That said, those > transparency gaps are what not having the proper infrastructure and > humans involved at every step of the process leads to. That is what our > future looks like if we switch to Zoom permanently. > > We need infrastructure that helps us run meetings AND record what > happened in those meetings for archival, accessibility, and intellectual > property release purposes. Zoom only solves part of the equation and > will never get us to something that's fully automated. Jitsi provides a > path forward for full automation... but it'll take time and effort to > get there. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches > https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2020 16:14:33 UTC