- From: Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 18:29:28 -0700
- To: Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
- Cc: MXS Insights <mxsinsights@gmail.com>, Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io>, Wayne Chang <wyc@fastmail.fm>, W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFmmOzfBWa5XWqEWYNmjbpFWQEwQ+udkq+NPJLBbJ7Xu0=i+LQ@mail.gmail.com>
I created a github issue to track the work item proposal and marked as "accepted": https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/149 Orie, can you review/respond to the questions in the issue? After getting your feedback, the chairs will move ahead to create the work item. On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 3:28 PM Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> wrote: > Thanks for the support! > > The term universal is meant to imply that the wallet can store any content > that one might want in the wallet. > > As I said of the call when I presented a while back, we saw that crypto > currency, identity and payment wallets were all storing some overlapping > and non overlapping data. > > We intend to define a JSON data model for wallet content that will help > with interoperability.. particularly in representing the private side of > DIDs and VCs, for example, references to mnemonics or KMS solutions used to > produce the identifiers or signatures. > > The current data model is based on JSON-LD (as are DIDs and VCs) however, > CBOR-LD opens the door for the same data model to be used for IoT... > > And of course you can choose to use the JSON representations for interop, > while relying on compact CBOR representations internally. > > OS > > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 5:04 PM Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Digital Credentials Consortium would also like to co-sponsor and work on >> this effort. I can be the contact (owner in github). >> >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 9:29 AM MXS Insights <mxsinsights@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Can someone define what is meant by ‘Universal’? >>> >>> For example, does this mean that this wallet would work on a >>> cryptographically capable, but headless IoT device? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Michael S. >>> >>> On Aug 20, 2020, at 6:19 PM, Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Wayne, >>> My inclination would be to just call it Universal Wallet rather than >>> tying it to a specific year, or universal-wallet-json-ld if we need to make >>> it more specific. >>> >>> Will defer to Orie on this topic however. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:28 AM Wayne Chang <wyc@fastmail.fm> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for your interest Mike. With two co-owners, we can now start a >>>> CCG work item. >>>> >>>> Orie and Mike, what would you want to name the work item and its >>>> repository? >>>> >>>> Default name: Universal Wallet 2020 >>>> Default repo name: w3c-ccg/universal-wallet-2020 >>>> >>>> Are these okay, or do you want something else? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020, at 8:43 AM, Mike Prorock wrote: >>>> >>>> Orie, >>>> We would happily support and co-sponsor/collaborate on this effort. >>>> This type of interoperability would be highly useful to us. >>>> >>>> Mike Prorock >>>> CTO, Founder >>>> https://mesur.io/ >>>> +1.919.633.8773 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > > -- > *ORIE STEELE* > Chief Technical Officer > www.transmute.industries > > <https://www.transmute.industries> >
Received on Friday, 21 August 2020 01:29:52 UTC