- From: Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 23:02:06 +0200
- To: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 10 August 2019 21:02:35 UTC
Per Manu's message <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2019Aug/0026.html> about next steps, I did the following: 1. Created a static copy of the DID Spec Final Community Group Report here: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-spec/CGFR/2019-08-10/ I chose to name the path "CGFR" rather than "FCGS", seems the more up-to-date convention to me, but let me know if there's any issue with that. 2. Ran the document through W3C Validators, unfortunately a few HTML and CSS errors came up: https://validator.w3.org/unicorn/check?ucn_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c-ccg.github.io%2Fdid-spec%2FCGFR%2F2019-08-10%2F&ucn_task=conformance# Those errors are a bit of a mystery to me, as far as I can tell their origins are W3C tools themselves (ReSpec and stylesheets), so perhaps it's okay to ignore them? In that case, I think the next step is for everyone to review, and for the W3C CCG Chairs to publish the CGFR. Markus
Received on Saturday, 10 August 2019 21:02:35 UTC