I've followed-up independently[1] [1] https://github.com/solid/node-solid-server/issues/429 On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 at 04:11 David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk> wrote: > > > On 10/08/2016 17:07, Shane McCarron wrote: > > Actually.... > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:45 AM, David Chadwick > > <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk <mailto:d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Three comments on this: > > i) Specific processors will presumably be controlled by the user > sending > > the VC to the chosen inspector, so this is quite straightforward > > ii) We currently do not say anything about specific periods of time > as > > far as I am aware, so there is a mismatch here between your > definition > > and the model > > > > > > See the use cases; H.4 [1] > > I missed that one! Thankyou > > > > > > > iii) I would like to add to the end of your proposal 'and ensure that > > the credentials do not contain correlating identifiers' (notice that > I > > specifically said credential rather than claim in this respect) > > > > > > Friendly amendment: and ensure that the credentials are not required to > > contain correlating identifiers. > > Ok, thanks. Or maybe, 'do not contain unintended correlating > identifiers' which is slightly different to 'not required to' > > David > > > > > [1] http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/use-cases/#uneed_H_4 > > > > > > -- > > Shane McCarron > > Projects Manager, Spec-Ops >
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 18:29:55 UTC