W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > August 2016

Re: Revised Verifiable Claims WG Charter (RC-2) (was Re: Problem statement)

From: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 19:11:46 +0100
To: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
Cc: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1bb5d4bc-77d5-4f52-1f61-95a2649acd47@kent.ac.uk>


On 10/08/2016 17:07, Shane McCarron wrote:
> Actually....
> 
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:45 AM, David Chadwick
> <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk <mailto:d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     Three comments on this:
>     i) Specific processors will presumably be controlled by the user sending
>     the VC to the chosen inspector, so this is quite straightforward
>     ii) We currently do not say anything about specific periods of time as
>     far as I am aware, so there is a mismatch here between your definition
>     and the model
> 
> 
> See the use cases; H.4 [1]

I missed that one! Thankyou

>  
> 
>     iii) I would like to add to the end of your proposal 'and ensure that
>     the credentials do not contain correlating identifiers' (notice that I
>     specifically said credential rather than claim in this respect)
> 
> 
> Friendly amendment: and ensure that the credentials are not required to
> contain correlating identifiers.

Ok, thanks. Or maybe, 'do not contain unintended correlating
identifiers' which is slightly different to 'not required to'

David

> 
> [1] http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/use-cases/#uneed_H_4
> 
> 
> -- 
> Shane McCarron
> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 18:12:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:24:42 UTC