- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:02:15 -0500
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, public-credentials@w3.org, public-socialweb@w3.org, Stéphane Boyera <boyera@w3.org>
On 11/19/2014 02:30 PM, Harry Halpin wrote: > There is no debate. JOSE is a standard for JSON that has had high > review and adoption from the IETF. SM is a proposed specification > from a Community Group for RDF that is out of scope for the Social > Web WG, although conceivably some future WG at the IETF could find > their normalization algorithm useful. It's not the place of a W3C staff contact to declare victory and shut down a debate. You're overstepping your authority, Harry. Clearly, people are arguing about JOSE vs. SM. There is a debate, even if you don't want there to be one. Here are the points where I agree with you: * Standardizing SM via Social Web WG is clearly out of scope of the charter. No one has asked Social Web WG to take on that work. * The RDF Graph Normalization stuff will happen in a group that cares about that sort of thing, not in the Social Web WG. * It's probably not worth debating whether or not RDF Graph Normalization or SM is going to happen in the Social Web WG. However, stating that JOSE is the obvious choice for digital signatures in the Social Web WG, the Web Payments CG, the Credentials CG, the Linked Data Platform, or even the Web Payments IG is very far from reality and you'll find that there will be considerable push-back if the Social Web WG tries to railroad the use of JOSE through on something that touches Linked Data. > For the Social Web WG, as regards JSON, we will use JOSE as SM is out > of scope as its not part of our deliverables. If another WG > standardizes SM (which I would be doubtful of), then I'm happy to > reconsider. It's not for you alone to decide which digital signature mechanism the Social Web WG is going to use. W3C operates on consensus, and there is currently no consensus on which digital signature mechanism would be best. It's highly inappropriate of a W3C staff contact (you) to assert that a group /will/ use a particular technology, especially when that very "decision" is being challenged by multiple people in the community. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 02:02:42 UTC