- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:04:19 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, public-credentials@w3.org, Stéphane Boyera <boyera@w3.org>
It is likely that Richard Barnes who is one of the JOSE people will be forced changing his specification [1] but this one published September 2014 is probably identical to the JCS (JSON Cleartext Signature) specification with the exception that keys are expressed as JWKs: https://github.com/letsencrypt/acme-spec/blob/master/draft-barnes-acme.md That is, hiding the actual message in Base64 isn't really that "appetizing" which is what I have been saying all the time... { "type": "certificateRequest", "csr": "5jNudRx6Ye4HzKEqT5...FS6aKdZeGsysoCo4H9P", "signature": { "alg": "RS256", "nonce": "h5aYpWVkq-xlJh6cpR-3cw", "sig": "KxITJ0rNlfDMAtfDr8eAw...fSSoehDFNZKQKzTZPtQ", "jwk": { "kty":"RSA", "e":"AQAB", "n":"KxITJ0rNlfDMAtfDr8eAw...fSSoehDFNZKQKzTZPtQ" } } } Anders 1] Being a non-conformist in a standards context is difficult, I know :-) :-)
Received on Friday, 28 November 2014 14:04:52 UTC