- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 17:40:26 -0700
- To: djohnson@commonlook.com
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAHu5OWYagOgDcF2cO6=0svsjZ4_Ga4uzogver3W5T3UQKCPFHQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:21 AM, <noreply@w3.org> wrote: > Name: Duff Johnson > Email: djohnson@commonlook.com > Affiliation: NetCentric Technologies > Document: W2 > Item Number: Success Criterion 2.1.1 > Part of Item: > Comment Type: general comment > Summary of Issue: Techniques do not apply (replaces comment on SC 2.2.1) > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > PDF3 and PDF11 do not apply to this SC. (I screwed up the form in > yesterday's submission). > > Proposed Change: > Remove PDF3 and PDF11 from the list of applicable Techniques. > > Delete the previous Comment on SC 2.2.1 > > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ Thank you, we have removed PDF 3 as a sufficient technique from SC 2.1.1 and 2.1.3. We have retained PDF11 because it demonstrates how to make text links keyboard accessible by associating them properly with Link Annotations. We are changing the title of PDF11 to make it clearer that providing the Link Annotation is part of the technique. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 00:40:56 UTC