W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Difficult to Understand

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:54:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHu5OWa7biY3YUWiHNBc3B4y00HOjF3FUG_3hi4YJ5h2q94CQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: devarshipant@gmail.com
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:06 PM, <noreply@w3.org> wrote:

> Name: Devarshi Pant
> Email: devarshipant@gmail.com
> Affiliation:
> Document: TD
> Item Number: G63
> Part of Item: Description
> Comment Type: general comment
> Summary of Issue: Difficult to Understand
> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
> The last sentence, "A Web page that does not link to all the sections of a
> site, that presents an organization that is different from the site's
> organization, or that contains links that are no longer valid is not a
> valid site map." is not easy to follow. It should be better understood as a
> bulleted / numbered list.
>
>
> Proposed Change:
> A Web page is not a valid site map when:
> 1. It does not link to all the sections of a site, or
> 2. It presents an organization that is different from the site's
> organization, or
> 3. It contains links that are no longer valid.
>
>
> ================================
Response from the Working Group
================================
Thanks for this suggestion. We are updating the description based on your
suggestion:

For example, a Web page is not a valid site map when any one of the
following is true:
1. it does not link to all the sections of a site, or
2. it presents an organization that is different from the site's
organization, or
3. it contains links that are no longer valid.

Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact


On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 22:54:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:14 UTC