- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:54:30 -0800
- To: devarshipant@gmail.com
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAHu5OWa7biY3YUWiHNBc3B4y00HOjF3FUG_3hi4YJ5h2q94CQw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:06 PM, <noreply@w3.org> wrote: > Name: Devarshi Pant > Email: devarshipant@gmail.com > Affiliation: > Document: TD > Item Number: G63 > Part of Item: Description > Comment Type: general comment > Summary of Issue: Difficult to Understand > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > The last sentence, "A Web page that does not link to all the sections of a > site, that presents an organization that is different from the site's > organization, or that contains links that are no longer valid is not a > valid site map." is not easy to follow. It should be better understood as a > bulleted / numbered list. > > > Proposed Change: > A Web page is not a valid site map when: > 1. It does not link to all the sections of a site, or > 2. It presents an organization that is different from the site's > organization, or > 3. It contains links that are no longer valid. > > > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ Thanks for this suggestion. We are updating the description based on your suggestion: For example, a Web page is not a valid site map when any one of the following is true: 1. it does not link to all the sections of a site, or 2. it presents an organization that is different from the site's organization, or 3. it contains links that are no longer valid. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 22:54:59 UTC