public-comments-wcag20@w3.org from February 2011 by subject

(None currently documented) stands at the beginning of examples, although examples are available

• noreply@w3.org (Monday, 21 February)

Editorial Errors in Understanding WCAG

• Tomas Caspers (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Tomas Caspers (Thursday, 3 February)

Editorial Errors in WCAG Techniques

• Tomas Caspers (Thursday, 24 February)

Errata page at http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/

• noreply@w3.org (Monday, 28 February)

H89: certainly cannot be a sufficient technique

• Sailesh Panchang (Wednesday, 16 February)

I feel that the 2 sufficient techniques should be 'and' not 'or'.

• noreply@w3.org (Saturday, 19 February)

Link to SC 3.1.2 links to Guideline 3.1

• noreply@w3.org (Tuesday, 22 February)

no link to single file from http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/Overview.html

• noreply@w3.org (Saturday, 12 February)

None currently documented should not be there

• noreply@w3.org (Monday, 21 February)

Sufficient techniques- definition and guidance

• Sailesh Panchang (Thursday, 17 February)

Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2011 14:37:35 UTC