public-comments-wcag20@w3.org from February 2011 by author

noreply@w3.org

• Errata page at http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/ (Monday, 28 February)
• Link to SC 3.1.2 links to Guideline 3.1 (Tuesday, 22 February)
• None currently documented should not be there (Monday, 21 February)
• (None currently documented) stands at the beginning of examples, although examples are available (Monday, 21 February)
• I feel that the 2 sufficient techniques should be 'and' not 'or'. (Saturday, 19 February)
• no link to single file from http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/Overview.html (Saturday, 12 February)

Sailesh Panchang

• Sufficient techniques- definition and guidance (Thursday, 17 February)
• H89: certainly cannot be a sufficient technique (Wednesday, 16 February)

Tomas Caspers

• Editorial Errors in WCAG Techniques (Thursday, 24 February)
• Editorial Errors in Understanding WCAG (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Editorial Errors in Understanding WCAG (Thursday, 3 February)

Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2011 14:37:35 UTC