Re: Text that is difficult to understand. Needs to be simplified and may be have an illustrative example.

Hello Loretta,
Thank you for the response. The paragraph is much clearer now.
Best regards
Sylvie

Loretta Guarino Reid a écrit :
> Sylvie,
>
> My apologies! I accidentally sent you the working group response to a
> different comment. Here is the response that should have been sent:
>
> Thank you for bringing this to our attention.  We are simplifying the
> paragraph and providing an example:
>
> Sufficient techniques are provided in a numbered list where each list
> item provides the technique or combination of techniques that can be
> used to meet the Success Criterion. When there are multiple techniques
> on a numbered list item connected by "AND" then all of the techniques
> must be used.
>
> For example, Situation B in Understanding Success Criterion 2.2.1
> lists as the third sufficient technique:
>  SCR16: Providing a script that warns the user a time limit is about
> to expire (Scripting) AND  SCR1: Allowing the user to extend the
> default time limit  (Scripting)
>
> So both SCR16 and SCR1 must be used to satisfy this success criterion.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Loretta Guarino Reid
> <lorettaguarino@google.com> wrote:
>   
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:54 AM,  <sylvie.duchateau@accessiweb.org> wrote:
>>     
>>> Name: Sylvie Duchateau
>>> Email: sylvie.duchateau@accessiweb.org
>>> Affiliation: Association BrailleNet
>>> Document: TD
>>> Item Number: (none selected)
>>> Part of Item: Applicability
>>> Comment Type: editorial
>>> Summary of Issue: Text that is difficult to understand. Needs to be simplified and may be have an illustrative example.
>>> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
>>> Location : introduction of Techniques for WCAG 2.0 and Understanding WCAG 2.0, Heading h3 "sufficient techniques".
>>> paragraph added on July 2010 draft.
>>>
>>> "[Begin add] In some cases it's only when a combination
>>> of techniques are used that it is considered sufficient. In these cases, the sufficient combination of techniques are listed together on one numbered line
>>>
>>> in the “How to Meet WCAG 2.0” and “Understanding WCAG 2.0” documents. Each numbered line is sufficient to meet the Success Criteria it addresses, but the
>>>
>>> individual techniques on that line are not sufficient by themselves unless they are on a numbered line by themselves.[end add]
>>>
>>>
>>> Proposed Change:
>>> Simplify this paragraph that does not sound clear at all.
>>> What does this "numbered line" wording mean?
>>> May be giving an example to illustrate what is meant would be helpful.
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> ================================
>> Response from the Working Group
>> ================================
>> Thank you for alerting us to this improvement in Firefox, and for
>> identifying the places that needed updating. We have determined that
>> this fix occurred in Firefox 3.0, so instead of removing Firefox from
>> the User Agent Notes, we have corrected them to versions of Firefox
>> before Firefox 3.0.
>>
>> In general, we have not added the notes about Safari to the
>> descriptions of the techniques. Safari's restrictions are included in
>> the User Agent Notes, and including the Safari restrictions in the
>> descriptions makes the techniques more difficult to understand.
>>
>>
>> Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
>> Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
>> Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact
>>
>>
>> On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
>>
>>     
>
>

Received on Sunday, 12 September 2010 09:46:10 UTC