- From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 04:07:25 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Name: Jason White Email: jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au Affiliation: Document: W2 Item Number: Conformance Part of Item: Comment Type: technical Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): The editorial note to conformance requirement 4 points out the difficulty that can arise with technologies which do not permit this requirement to be satisfied. Limitations regarding an author\'s content or server that can be removed by changing server-side configurations or altering content should not be regarded as constraints that prevent the implementation of this requirement however, as these can all be overcome (in the second case by changing the design of the content and in the first case by securing the cooperation of the server operator, if the server operator is not the author of the content). With these remarks having been made, however, there remains the possibility that a given technology, or combination of technologies, in which a Web page is written may not provide the necessary mechanism to meet requirement 4. This possibility is addressed in the following proposal. Proposed Change: If it turns out that some technologies do not permit requirement 4 to be met, then split the requirement into two alternative cases. Case 1: Where the technologies used to implement the non-conforming content support the provision of such a mechanism, stipulate that a mechanism of the kind stated in Requirement 4 as currently drafted, must be provided. Case 2: where requirement 4 as currently proposed cannot be met, specify the following weaker requirement: The non-conforming page is part of a set of Web pages, at least one of which provides a mechanism to obtain an alternate, conformant version. Obviously, this mechanism would itself have to satisfy conformance requirements, and the wording currently used to describe the mechanism captures this intent perfectly, and should be carried over into any revised draft. Note that the term \"set of Web pages\" is already defined in the glossary and used elsewhere in the guidelines, and thus can be employed here without introducing any new terminology or concepts.
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 04:07:39 UTC