- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:30:02 -0700
- To: "Gian Sampson-Wild" <gian@tkh.com.au>
- Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
The note was added to the Sufficient Techniques Section of Understanding Success Criterion 2.2.6 (Re-authenticating): http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20070517/#time-limits-server-timeout-110-head Loretta On 7/6/07, Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au> wrote: > Comment 70: > > Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer > (Issue ID: LC-1097) > > Example - A questionnaire with a timeout: In this example, there are several > recommendations that certainly would make the questionnaire more accessible > (alert popups, information on timeout etc) but these do not actually relate > to this (or any) SC. These are excellent requirements - they should be > developed into SC > > Proposed Change: > > Create new SC (I am happy to help with this) > > ---------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > ---------------------------- > > This example illustrates the use of techniques for both 2.2.6 and 2.2.1. To > make this clear, we have added a note that reads, "Refer to [Techniques for > Addressing Success Criterion 2.2.1] for techniques related to providing > notifications about time-outs." to the listing of sufficient techniques in > 2.2.6. > ---------------------------- > Response from GSW: > ---------------------------- > I'm sorry I can't find this reference. Could you please clarify where > exactly you have added text? > >
Received on Saturday, 7 July 2007 00:30:22 UTC