W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > July 2007

Comment LC-1097

From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 00:24:35 +1000
To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003c01c7bfd9$63df8570$b300a8c0@tkhcomputer>

Comment 70:

Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer
(Issue ID: LC-1097)

Example - A questionnaire with a timeout: In this example, there are several
recommendations that certainly would make the questionnaire more accessible
(alert popups, information on timeout etc) but these do not actually relate
to this (or any) SC. These are excellent requirements - they should be
developed into SC

Proposed Change:

Create new SC (I am happy to help with this)

Response from Working Group:

This example illustrates the use of techniques for both 2.2.6 and 2.2.1. To
make this clear, we have added a note that reads, "Refer to [Techniques for
Addressing Success Criterion 2.2.1] for techniques related to providing
notifications about time-outs." to the listing of sufficient techniques in
Response from GSW:
I'm sorry I can't find this reference. Could you please clarify where
exactly you have added text?
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 14:24:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 October 2017 07:46:01 UTC