Re: Issue 197 (multiple issues including adding to Toms persona) Please respond by feb 21

+ 1 with a minor edit:

"We also feel the AI suggestions are reliable enough yet to be recommended"
--
the word "not" should be added between "reliable" and "enough"

Again, my sincerest apologies for the day-late response!

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:27 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks
>
> Issue 197 had a lot of editorial suggestions, but also  some additions to the document. Most of them are simple to accept but some we have deferred to a next version.
>
> Please respond by feb 21. We will consider silence as agreement.
>
> *Draft response:*
>
> Thank you for your wonderful review. We have put in most of your
> suggestions into the next version.
> As well the editorial comments and clarifications, we have also:
>
>    1. Added Ben's suggestion for a help/orientation button into the
>    examples of pattern 4.2.4 - make each step clear.
>    2. Added shifting font sizes  to the pattern on personalization support
>    3. Added to Toms persona the following: "He struggles  keeping track
>    of what he is doing in complex tasks.It is important for Tom to have the
>    steps of tasks clearly presented, and a mechanism like breadcrumbs that
>    helps Tom keep track of where he is in a task with multiple steps.Tom
>    appreciates it when  tasks are as simple as possible. "It can't ever be too
>    simple," he says.
>
>
> "
> There were a few points that we have to postpone for now. Specifically:
>
>    - We feel that the rainbow approach is out of scope for this document
>    which is  guidance for Web content.
>    - We can attempt to expand and review Sec 3.7.3 in more detail in the
>    next version.  Similarly we can review  4.2.5.2  then as well.
>    - We also feel the AI suggestions are reliable enough yet to be
>    recommended. However we would like to add this to research topics. Likewise
>    we feel more research is needed before we can suggest that divide numbers
>    need to be big. We would welcome any additional comments, research or
>    contributions from you ongoing.
>
>
> Thanks again for your wonderful contributions
>
> The task force.
>
>
>