- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:26:52 +0200
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKExBMJdzdad_JfGo0NsZ9kXnsphr1YuW6wh+LEhEYsm2-yNxg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Folks Issue 197 had a lot of editorial suggestions, but also some additions to the document. Most of them are simple to accept but some we have deferred to a next version. Please respond by feb 21. We will consider silence as agreement. *Draft response:* Thank you for your wonderful review. We have put in most of your suggestions into the next version. As well the editorial comments and clarifications, we have also: 1. Added Ben's suggestion for a help/orientation button into the examples of pattern 4.2.4 - make each step clear. 2. Added shifting font sizes to the pattern on personalization support 3. Added to Toms persona the following: "He struggles keeping track of what he is doing in complex tasks.It is important for Tom to have the steps of tasks clearly presented, and a mechanism like breadcrumbs that helps Tom keep track of where he is in a task with multiple steps.Tom appreciates it when tasks are as simple as possible. "It can't ever be too simple," he says. " There were a few points that we have to postpone for now. Specifically: - We feel that the rainbow approach is out of scope for this document which is guidance for Web content. - We can attempt to expand and review Sec 3.7.3 in more detail in the next version. Similarly we can review 4.2.5.2 then as well. - We also feel the AI suggestions are reliable enough yet to be recommended. However we would like to add this to research topics. Likewise we feel more research is needed before we can suggest that divide numbers need to be big. We would welcome any additional comments, research or contributions from you ongoing. Thanks again for your wonderful contributions The task force.
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2021 17:27:43 UTC