- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:21:34 +0900
- To: public-cdf@w3.org
Dear CDF working group, This message concludes, for now, my review of the first public working draft of "Compound Document Framework 1.0 and WICD Profiles", Dated 09 August 2005 http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WICD-20050809/ Overall, as I stated in my introduction to the review, I think this is a very good and already well written document. I consider my comments as suggestions for the continuation and development of this good work, rather than raising issues. My comments so far were: * Introduction http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0015.html * [WICD-oT-1] WICD review - general comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0016.html * [WICD-oT-2] WICD review - specification naming http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0017.html * [WICD-oT-3] WICD review - scope of the framework http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0018.html * [WICD-oT-4] WICD review - conformance section http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0019.html * [WICD-oT-5] WICD review - normative versus informative http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0020.html * [WICD-oT-6] WICD review - give (even) more definitions, or references to definitions http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0021.html and clarification: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/ 2005Aug/0026.html * [WICD-oT-7] WICD review - split the specification http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0022.html * [WICD-oT-8] WICD review - define "compound document" earlier http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0023.html * [WICD-oT-9] WICD review - typos http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0024.html * [WICD-oT-10] WICD review - definition of "root document" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0025.html I hope these comments will be useful to the CDF working group in developing a good, interoperable technology. Kind regards, -- olivier
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2005 03:21:40 UTC