Re: Mutability of the decodeAudioData argument

On 29 Nov 2012, at 10:38, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote:
> If it were restored to a normal state after the decoding is complete, then that seems ok.
> 
> So, can I proceed to assume that the spec will be changed accordingly?
> 
> Yes, that sounds good.
>  

Can this agreement be recorded (along with link to archive of e-mail thread) in a bugzilla issue?

Thanks,
Olivier