Re: Mutability of the decodeAudioData argument from Chris Rogers on 2012-11-29 (public-audio@w3.org from October to December 2012)

From: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 02:38:45 -0800
To: Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com>
Cc: Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com>, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, public-audio@w3.org
Message-ID: <CA+EzO0muWkUjy90GAv=fvjV1Ag3vyP=_d8YAOUan_nn-78pXKQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote:
>
>> If it were restored to a normal state after the decoding is complete,
>> then that seems ok.
>>
>
> So, can I proceed to assume that the spec will be changed accordingly?
>

Yes, that sounds good.


>
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Ehsan
> <http://ehsanakhgari.org/>
>

Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 10:39:17 UTC