Re: Mutability of the decodeAudioData argument

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Olivier Thereaux <
olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote:

>
> On 29 Nov 2012, at 10:38, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
> wrote:
> > If it were restored to a normal state after the decoding is complete,
> then that seems ok.
> >
> > So, can I proceed to assume that the spec will be changed accordingly?
> >
> > Yes, that sounds good.
> >
>
> Can this agreement be recorded (along with link to archive of e-mail
> thread) in a bugzilla issue?
>

Sure: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20161

--
Ehsan
<http://ehsanakhgari.org/>

Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:17:55 UTC