- From: James Teh <jamie@nvaccess.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 08:26:12 +1000
- To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, surkov.alexander@gmail.com
- Cc: wai-xtech@w3.org, public-aria@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2016 22:26:39 UTC
I'm even more convinced that static text is the more correct role recently, especially because ATK made the same decision. That said, I'd argue that IA2_ROLE_TEXTFRAME should never be treated as inherently block. NVDA certainly never does this; it always makes that decision based on the display object attribute. Jamie On 20/01/2016 6:47 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: > Jamie and Alex, > We reviewed this topic and we agree with Jamie that role="text" should > map to a static text role: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2015Sep/0017.html > The reason is that IA2 text frames are treated as separate blocks by > ATs such as when role="presentation" being applied to tables where the > fallout is TDs become IA2_ROLE_TEXTFRAME. > If we were to treat role="text" as a separate block then it would not > be read inline with the surrounding text. > Rich > > Rich Schwerdtfeger > -- James Teh Executive Director, NV Access Limited Ph +61 7 3149 3306 www.nvaccess.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess SIP: jamie@nvaccess.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2016 22:26:39 UTC