- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:46:46 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
* Ian Hickson wrote: >It has come to my attention that not everybody thought that the xml:id >discussion was resovled. To recap, the conclusion was that xml:id can >be used with XBL2 if desired, and that in addition, a simple "id" >attribute is to be included for consistency with HTML. I understand from: If the URI contains a fragment identifier, it must point to a specific binding element (by id) within an XBL subtree in the specified document, and that element must be a direct child of an xbl element that does not itself have an xbl element as an ancestor; if these conditions are not met then the URI is in error. that authors cannot use xml:id instead of the id attribute. If they should be able to use xml:id instead, the reference to "by id" above is misleading. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 21 August 2006 14:13:35 UTC