- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:41:00 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Dave Hodder <dmh@dmh.org.uk>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>, Sjoerd Visscher <sjoerd@w3future.com>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Antoine Quint <aq@fuchsia-design.com>, Luca Mascaro <info@lucamascaro.info>, Scott Hayman <shayman@rim.com>, Doug Schepers <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
It has come to my attention that not everybody thought that the xml:id discussion was resovled. To recap, the conclusion was that xml:id can be used with XBL2 if desired, and that in addition, a simple "id" attribute is to be included for consistency with HTML. If this doesn't cater for your use case, please don't hesitate to reply to this e-mail explaining your use case and how this solution does not satisfy it. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 3 August 2006 21:41:29 UTC