- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:45:18 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > * Ian Hickson wrote: > >It has come to my attention that not everybody thought that the xml:id > >discussion was resovled. To recap, the conclusion was that xml:id can > >be used with XBL2 if desired, and that in addition, a simple "id" > >attribute is to be included for consistency with HTML. > > I understand from: > > If the URI contains a fragment identifier, it must point to a > specific binding element (by id) within an XBL subtree in the > specified document, and that element must be a direct child of > an xbl element that does not itself have an xbl element as an > ancestor; if these conditions are not met then the URI is in error. > > that authors cannot use xml:id instead of the id attribute. If they > should be able to use xml:id instead, the reference to "by id" above > is misleading. Fixed (moved parenthetical and made it merely an example). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 21 August 2006 23:45:43 UTC