W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > January 2016

Re: [web-annotation] Should Vocab have diagrams?

From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 04:34:21 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-170786840-1452573260-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I like diagrams:-) I believe having them in the vocab document is 
appropriate and o.k. Indeed, probably not in the JSON serialization 
document, though.

 

> On 12 Jan 2016, at 01:21, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> 
wrote:
> 
> While I think that the model/serialization doc is cleaner without 
the model diagrams, especially given the new JSON focus, I think it 
would be good to reinstate the diagrams in the vocab document.
> 
> That is, however a lot of work, and it would be good to have 
consensus on it before sitting down for a couple of days at the 
Omnigraffle mines.
> 
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub 
<https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/131>.
> 






-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by iherman
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/131#issuecomment-170786840
 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 12 January 2016 04:34:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:43 UTC