W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2015

[web-annotation] Clarify ability to reason with annotations - note additional statements to add to reasoner

From: None via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:14:13 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-115059850-1446646451-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
fhirsch has just created a new issue for 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation:

== Clarify ability to reason with annotations - note additional 
statements to add to reasoner ==
Issue:

Not clear how to reason with annotations as all statements are not 
explicit, some may need to be added to reasoner manually. 

Proposal:

Make explicit what might be added manually to reasoner.

Add a Note at the end of Section 1 in Model before 1.1 (Introduction) 
based on what Jacob suggested:

[[

Note: 

Implementers of reasoners can explicitly add the inference that "body 
relatedTo target" to enable reasoning with annotations. In addition,  
inferring "motivation subclassOf relatedTo" is also a valid 
interpretation (or use the predicate 'annotates'), especially if it 
serves some search retrieval function. "

]]

See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/98
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2015 14:14:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:42 UTC