Re: [web-annotation] Clarify ability to reason with annotations - note additional statements to add to reasoner

Good points @azaroth42.

Perhaps, then, we can include an Appendix (or some such) in the new 
"model only" doc that explains how to explicitly state relationships 
between body and target, or (alternatively) highlight that these 
Annotation documents aren't intended for that...and to "just use RDF."

I do think Randall's points need addressing somewhere, so that other 
people looking at Annotation and wondering how to (or if to) state 
that body and target are related are given a way to do it or an 
explanation of why the Annotation doesn't.

Maybe we already do that, and I've just missed it. :smiley: 

-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by BigBlueHat
See 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/98#issuecomment-153772869

Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2015 15:57:39 UTC