W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2015

Re: [web-annotation] Clarify ability to reason with annotations - note additional statements to add to reasoner

From: Randall Leeds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 20:49:29 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-153860048-1446670168-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> not wanting to have parallel motivations and relationships

I'm not suggesting to have them in parallel. I'm suggesting to have 
relationships instead.

> It would be redundant to have [role: describing and describes: 

Yes. It would be. That's why I'm not suggesting role either.

I'm suggesting just to have the relationship and questioning the value
 of motivation (and role). I am becoming only more convinced that 
motivation is intentionally vague and needlessly indirect. Role 
suffers from the exact same issues but is more granular, letting us 
get specific about which vague, indirect relationship we're avoiding.

GitHub Notif of comment by tilgovi
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2015 20:49:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:42 UTC