Re: [web-annotation] Clarify ability to reason with annotations - note additional statements to add to reasoner

I think the main point of @tilgovi's argument is:
> Interpretation of motivations that I would like to specify so that 
the interpretation is not idiosyncratic but normative.
 
Such that a triple could be inferred of Body _something_ Target, for 
all combinations of all 0-m bodies and 1-n targets.

I disagree that this is a legitimate concern because it implies that 
there is some way in which we can reliably know what to put in 
_something_. The motivation is intentionally fuzzy and high level 
because it's impossible to know the interpretation (indeed, the 
motivation) of the user for their annotation.

If this is not idiosyncratic, then triples could simply be added to 
the graph that express the relationship between resources as desired.
  For example, to be explicit that the body `foaf:depicts` the target:
 

```
{
  "type": "Annotation",
  "body": {
    "source": "http://example.org/photo1",
    "role": "tagging",
    "foaf:depicts": "http://example.com/person1"
  },
  "target": "http://example.com/person1"
}
```


-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by azaroth42
See 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/98#issuecomment-153816297

Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2015 18:17:47 UTC