- From: Denenberg, Ray <rden@loc.gov>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:55:31 -0400
- To: "'Web Annotation'" <public-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0EEF938438DEF843A0AAAC358E4A987402B0410C@LCXCLMB03.LCDS.LOC.GOV>
Has the following approach been considered? I don't think it violates any of the principles that Rob is defending, because it explicitly narrows the scope of the role to the annotation: <http://www.example.org/annotation> a oa:Annotation ; oa:hasTarget <http://www.example.org/target> ; oa:hasBody <http://www.example.org/body1> ; oa:hasBody <http://www.example.org/body2> ; oa:hasBody <http://www.example.org/body2> ; oa:hasRoleAssignment [ oa:role <role1> ; oa:assignedTo <http://www.example.org/body1> ; oa:forAnnotation <http://www.example.org/annotation> ] ; oa:hasRoleAssignment [ oa:role <role2> ; oa:assignedTo <http://www.example.org/body2> ; oa:forAnnotation <http://www.example.org/annotation> ] ; oa:hasRoleAssignment [ oa:role <role3> ; oa:assignedTo <http://www.example.org/body3> ; oa:forAnnotation <http://www.example.org/annotation> ] . --Ray
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2015 20:56:04 UTC