- From: Denenberg, Ray <rden@loc.gov>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:55:31 -0400
- To: "'Web Annotation'" <public-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0EEF938438DEF843A0AAAC358E4A987402B0410C@LCXCLMB03.LCDS.LOC.GOV>
Has the following approach been considered? I don't think it violates any of the principles that Rob is defending, because it explicitly narrows the scope of the role to the annotation:
<http://www.example.org/annotation> a oa:Annotation ;
oa:hasTarget <http://www.example.org/target> ;
oa:hasBody <http://www.example.org/body1> ;
oa:hasBody <http://www.example.org/body2> ;
oa:hasBody <http://www.example.org/body2> ;
oa:hasRoleAssignment [
oa:role <role1> ;
oa:assignedTo <http://www.example.org/body1> ;
oa:forAnnotation <http://www.example.org/annotation> ] ;
oa:hasRoleAssignment [
oa:role <role2> ;
oa:assignedTo <http://www.example.org/body2> ;
oa:forAnnotation <http://www.example.org/annotation> ] ;
oa:hasRoleAssignment [
oa:role <role3> ;
oa:assignedTo <http://www.example.org/body3> ;
oa:forAnnotation <http://www.example.org/annotation> ] .
--Ray
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2015 20:56:04 UTC