Re: Paper and talk in 2020, Arlington

Thanks

Please enter any of the (brief) points you wish you contribute to this
submission in the abstract section
(specifically related to KR for transparency and accountability)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iZARdPoWeEZzld1iugl5hlaMh7aaYrJkD7SiEycXvdQ/edit

(preferably before dec 24)

I ll submit it asap

We can then elaborate the points  into a page or section for a paper
submission to some journal, if academic publication is of interest to this
group and maybe  with a practical handbook for CIOs, which could be our own
publication and free gift to the world

PDM

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 4:16 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:

> Since my July 1999 paper on KM is difficult to read in the original HTML,
> I have now published it in PDF at http://ambur.net/6thGenKM.pdf
>
> The 33rd end note is somewhat ironic.  It says:
>
> Balla concludes: With every release of Microsoft Office, Windows NT and
> Exchange, Microsoft is moving closer and closer to providing a platform
> that organizations can use as an infrastructure for their KM initiative.
> Microsoft has even announced a major focus on KM for its upcoming product
> versions... thanks to Microsoft's marketing muscle, the KM industry will
> become legitimized overnight.
>
> It has been a fairly long night and it seems doubtful even now that MS
> Project Cortex can be taken as more than merely a new beginning, in a
> proprietary environment.
>
> On page 12, I quoted Savage as suggesting,  "... teams should be
> responsible for defining their goals, purpose, and mission - together with
> their project plan - in a shareable database."  For public objectives, I
> now believe that "database" should be the Internet.  See
> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/i-only-had-brain-evolving-prefrontal-core-text-internet-owen-ambur/,
> whose title has an amazingly coincidental parallel to MS's new project.
>
> Owen
>
>
> On 12/20/2019 1:15 PM, Ronald Reck wrote:
>
> I am local to DC, I am out of town right now and cant review this thread in detail right now.
> I am happy to contribute and help with delivery.
>
> -Ronald P. Reck
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:44:52 +0800, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks a lot Owen
>
> are you local to DC?
>
> I think we just need to send the abstract asap
>  then start working on a paper hoping that we can agree on scope and
> language
>
>  KR is the way we can hold  government guys accountable, we just need to
> make
> a compelling case for them.
>
> Please feel free to start drafting, glad this resonates with you and
> hopefully Carl, who had some input in the Taipei talk as well as hopefully
> others of course,
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:26 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
> Paola, I am very interested in the use of AI to foster transparency and
> accountability in government.  While this May 1998 presentation makes no
> reference to AI, it is all about records management and accountability is
> all about records, preferably maintained and shared in open, standard,
> machine-readable format:  http://ambur.net/ASIS/KMvalue.html
>
> As revealed by this Google query<https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+for+records+management&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS868US868&oq=AI+for+records+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l7.6274j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8> <https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+for+records+management&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS868US868&oq=AI+for+records+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l7.6274j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8>,
> AI is now being widely used to support the classification and management of
> records.
>
> For background on machine-readability, seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document
>
> See also the closely related provisions of the OPEN Government Data Act
> (OGDA):https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/
>
> Here are some of the plans in the StratML collection that reference AI:
>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/C4DINAISwStyle.xml
>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DCGMwStyle.xml
>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DARPAPAIwStyle.xml
>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/NAIRDSPwStyle.xml
>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AI2wStyle.xml
>     http://stratml.us/carmel/KEwStyle.xml
>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/FRNTwStyle.xml
>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DMwStyle.xml
>
> It appears that AIIM may take up the cause of KM again, stimulated by MS Project
> Cortex <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSPCwStyle.xml> <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSPCwStyle.xml>.  Here are some of
> the artifacts generated by AIIM's last pass at that topic, in StratML
> format:  http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#AIIMKM
>
> I look forward to learning if this group can crowdsource the preparation
> of a proposed presentation making a significant contribution to the
> advancement of the cause of transparency and accountability in government
> at the International Academy of CIO (IAC) conference in Arlington,
> Virginia, on September 28 - 30.
>
> For those whom may be unfamiliar with that IAC, their about statement is
> available in StratML format at http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/IACTwStyle.xml
> In the DC area, this is the IAC more commonly known:http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IAC
>
> Owen
>
> On 12/19/2019 8:45 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>
> Greetings folks
>
> There is an opportunity to make the next contribution to the next AICIO
> conference in DC
>
> I would like to attend in person, if possible,  and maybe that could be an
> opportunity to hangout
> together and pitch our work to the CIO community, which is so important
> (and so much in need of guidance)
> or if I cannot attend, maybe we can have someone local to go and present
>
> Here is more or les what I have in mind,
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iZARdPoWeEZzld1iugl5hlaMh7aaYrJkD7SiEycXvdQ/edit?usp=sharing
>
>  if someone is inspired to co author, let's pitch
> I think the main challenge is to find agreement on what to say
> (for example, Carl Own and myself have so far contributed to this topic on
> this list
> may have different opinions for the direction of this work, and speak
> different languages)
> I guess thats part of the mission
>
> I am also reminding co chairs that we are waitinf for their mission
> statements
> to proceed with their nominations
>
> Thanks
>
> PDM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>