Re: Paper and talk in 2020, Arlington

Since my July 1999 paper on KM is difficult to read in the original 
HTML, I have now published it in PDF at http://ambur.net/6thGenKM.pdf

The 33rd end note is somewhat ironic.  It says:

    Balla concludes: With every release of Microsoft Office, Windows NT
    and Exchange, Microsoft is moving closer and closer to providing a
    platform that organizations can use as an infrastructure for their
    KM initiative. Microsoft has even announced a major focus on KM for
    its upcoming product versions... thanks to Microsoft's marketing
    muscle, the KM industry will become legitimized overnight.

It has been a fairly long night and it seems doubtful even now that MS 
Project Cortex can be taken as more than merely a new beginning, in a 
proprietary environment.

On page 12, I quoted Savage as suggesting,  "... teams should be 
responsible for defining their goals, purpose, and mission - together 
with their project plan - in a shareable database."  For public 
objectives, I now believe that "database" should be the Internet.  See 
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/i-only-had-brain-evolving-prefrontal-core-text-internet-owen-ambur/, 
whose title has an amazingly coincidental parallel to MS's new project.

Owen


On 12/20/2019 1:15 PM, Ronald Reck wrote:
> I am local to DC, I am out of town right now and cant review this thread in detail right now.
> I am happy to contribute and help with delivery.
>
> -Ronald P. Reck
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:44:52 +0800, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks a lot Owen
>>
>> are you local to DC?
>>
>> I think we just need to send the abstract asap
>>   then start working on a paper hoping that we can agree on scope and
>> language
>>
>>   KR is the way we can hold  government guys accountable, we just need to
>> make
>> a compelling case for them.
>>
>> Please feel free to start drafting, glad this resonates with you and
>> hopefully Carl, who had some input in the Taipei talk as well as hopefully
>> others of course,
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:26 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Paola, I am very interested in the use of AI to foster transparency and
>>> accountability in government.  While this May 1998 presentation makes no
>>> reference to AI, it is all about records management and accountability is
>>> all about records, preferably maintained and shared in open, standard,
>>> machine-readable format:  http://ambur.net/ASIS/KMvalue.html
>>>
>>> As revealed by this Google query
>>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+for+records+management&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS868US868&oq=AI+for+records+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l7.6274j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8>,
>>> AI is now being widely used to support the classification and management of
>>> records.
>>>
>>> For background on machine-readability, see
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document
>>>
>>> See also the closely related provisions of the OPEN Government Data Act
>>> (OGDA):
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/
>>>
>>> Here are some of the plans in the StratML collection that reference AI:
>>>      http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/C4DINAISwStyle.xml
>>>      http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DCGMwStyle.xml
>>>      http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DARPAPAIwStyle.xml
>>>      http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/NAIRDSPwStyle.xml
>>>      http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AI2wStyle.xml
>>>      http://stratml.us/carmel/KEwStyle.xml
>>>      http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/FRNTwStyle.xml
>>>      http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DMwStyle.xml
>>>
>>> It appears that AIIM may take up the cause of KM again, stimulated by MS Project
>>> Cortex <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSPCwStyle.xml>.  Here are some of
>>> the artifacts generated by AIIM's last pass at that topic, in StratML
>>> format:  http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#AIIMKM
>>>
>>> I look forward to learning if this group can crowdsource the preparation
>>> of a proposed presentation making a significant contribution to the
>>> advancement of the cause of transparency and accountability in government
>>> at the International Academy of CIO (IAC) conference in Arlington,
>>> Virginia, on September 28 - 30.
>>>
>>> For those whom may be unfamiliar with that IAC, their about statement is
>>> available in StratML format at http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/IACTwStyle.xml
>>> In the DC area, this is the IAC more commonly known:
>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IAC
>>>
>>> Owen
>>>
>>> On 12/19/2019 8:45 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>
>>> Greetings folks
>>>
>>> There is an opportunity to make the next contribution to the next AICIO
>>> conference in DC
>>>
>>> I would like to attend in person, if possible,  and maybe that could be an
>>> opportunity to hangout
>>> together and pitch our work to the CIO community, which is so important
>>> (and so much in need of guidance)
>>> or if I cannot attend, maybe we can have someone local to go and present
>>>
>>> Here is more or les what I have in mind,
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iZARdPoWeEZzld1iugl5hlaMh7aaYrJkD7SiEycXvdQ/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>>   if someone is inspired to co author, let's pitch
>>> I think the main challenge is to find agreement on what to say
>>> (for example, Carl Own and myself have so far contributed to this topic on
>>> this list
>>> may have different opinions for the direction of this work, and speak
>>> different languages)
>>> I guess thats part of the mission
>>>
>>> I am also reminding co chairs that we are waitinf for their mission
>>> statements
>>> to proceed with their nominations
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> PDM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>