Re: Paper and talk in 2020, Arlington

I'm also local to DC and happy to contribute in any way I can.

Pradeep
________________________________
From: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 8:37:39 PM
To: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
Cc: Ronald Reck <rreck@rrecktek.com>; W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>; Pradeep Jain <pradeep.jain@ictect.com>; Mark Patrick <mark.patrick7759@gmail.com>; William Glascoe III <eosocxo@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Paper and talk in 2020, Arlington

Thanks

Please enter any of the (brief) points you wish you contribute to this submission in the abstract section
(specifically related to KR for transparency and accountability)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iZARdPoWeEZzld1iugl5hlaMh7aaYrJkD7SiEycXvdQ/edit
(preferably before dec 24)

I ll submit it asap

We can then elaborate the points  into a page or section for a paper submission to some journal, if academic publication is of interest to this group and maybe  with a practical handbook for CIOs, which could be our own publication and free gift to the world

PDM

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 4:16 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net<mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>> wrote:

Since my July 1999 paper on KM is difficult to read in the original HTML, I have now published it in PDF at http://ambur.net/6thGenKM.pdf

The 33rd end note is somewhat ironic.  It says:

Balla concludes: With every release of Microsoft Office, Windows NT and Exchange, Microsoft is moving closer and closer to providing a platform that organizations can use as an infrastructure for their KM initiative. Microsoft has even announced a major focus on KM for its upcoming product versions.... thanks to Microsoft's marketing muscle, the KM industry will become legitimized overnight.

It has been a fairly long night and it seems doubtful even now that MS Project Cortex can be taken as more than merely a new beginning, in a proprietary environment.

On page 12, I quoted Savage as suggesting,  "... teams should be responsible for defining their goals, purpose, and mission - together with their project plan - in a shareable database."  For public objectives, I now believe that "database" should be the Internet.  See https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/i-only-had-brain-evolving-prefrontal-core-text-internet-owen-ambur/, whose title has an amazingly coincidental parallel to MS's new project.

Owen


On 12/20/2019 1:15 PM, Ronald Reck wrote:

I am local to DC, I am out of town right now and cant review this thread in detail right now.
I am happy to contribute and help with delivery.

-Ronald P. Reck


On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:44:52 +0800, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com><mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:



Thanks a lot Owen

are you local to DC?

I think we just need to send the abstract asap
 then start working on a paper hoping that we can agree on scope and
language

 KR is the way we can hold  government guys accountable, we just need to
make
a compelling case for them.

Please feel free to start drafting, glad this resonates with you and
hopefully Carl, who had some input in the Taipei talk as well as hopefully
others of course,

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:26 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net><mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:



Paola, I am very interested in the use of AI to foster transparency and
accountability in government.  While this May 1998 presentation makes no
reference to AI, it is all about records management and accountability is
all about records, preferably maintained and shared in open, standard,
machine-readable format:  http://ambur.net/ASIS/KMvalue.html

As revealed by this Google query
<https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+for+records+management&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS868US868&oq=AI+for+records+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l7.6274j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8><https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+for+records+management&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS868US868&oq=AI+for+records+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l7.6274j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8>,
AI is now being widely used to support the classification and management of
records.

For background on machine-readability, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document

See also the closely related provisions of the OPEN Government Data Act
(OGDA):
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/

Here are some of the plans in the StratML collection that reference AI:
    http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/C4DINAISwStyle.xml
    http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DCGMwStyle.xml
    http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DARPAPAIwStyle.xml
    http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/NAIRDSPwStyle.xml
    http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AI2wStyle.xml
    http://stratml.us/carmel/KEwStyle.xml
    http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/FRNTwStyle.xml
    http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DMwStyle.xml

It appears that AIIM may take up the cause of KM again, stimulated by MS Project
Cortex <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSPCwStyle.xml><http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSPCwStyle.xml>.  Here are some of
the artifacts generated by AIIM's last pass at that topic, in StratML
format:  http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#AIIMKM

I look forward to learning if this group can crowdsource the preparation
of a proposed presentation making a significant contribution to the
advancement of the cause of transparency and accountability in government
at the International Academy of CIO (IAC) conference in Arlington,
Virginia, on September 28 - 30.

For those whom may be unfamiliar with that IAC, their about statement is
available in StratML format at http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/IACTwStyle.xml
In the DC area, this is the IAC more commonly known:
http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IAC

Owen

On 12/19/2019 8:45 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:

Greetings folks

There is an opportunity to make the next contribution to the next AICIO
conference in DC

I would like to attend in person, if possible,  and maybe that could be an
opportunity to hangout
together and pitch our work to the CIO community, which is so important
(and so much in need of guidance)
or if I cannot attend, maybe we can have someone local to go and present

Here is more or les what I have in mind,

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iZARdPoWeEZzld1iugl5hlaMh7aaYrJkD7SiEycXvdQ/edit?usp=sharing

 if someone is inspired to co author, let's pitch
I think the main challenge is to find agreement on what to say
(for example, Carl Own and myself have so far contributed to this topic on
this list
may have different opinions for the direction of this work, and speak
different languages)
I guess thats part of the mission

I am also reminding co chairs that we are waitinf for their mission
statements
to proceed with their nominations

Thanks

PDM