- From: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 21:29:28 -0500
- To: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <be86379a-0a35-92a0-7187-293e84b1cd79@verizon.net>
Done. On 12/20/2019 8:37 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote: > Thanks > > Please enter any of the (brief) points you wish you contribute to this > submission in the abstract section > (specifically related to KR for transparency and accountability) > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iZARdPoWeEZzld1iugl5hlaMh7aaYrJkD7SiEycXvdQ/edit > > (preferably before dec 24) > > I ll submit it asap > > We can then elaborate the points into a page or section for a paper > submission to some journal, if academic publication is of interest to > this group and maybe with a practical handbook for CIOs, which could > be our own publication and free gift to the world > > PDM > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 4:16 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net > <mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>> wrote: > > Since my July 1999 paper on KM is difficult to read in the > original HTML, I have now published it in PDF at > http://ambur.net/6thGenKM.pdf > > The 33rd end note is somewhat ironic. It says: > > Balla concludes: With every release of Microsoft Office, > Windows NT and Exchange, Microsoft is moving closer and closer > to providing a platform that organizations can use as an > infrastructure for their KM initiative. Microsoft has even > announced a major focus on KM for its upcoming product > versions... thanks to Microsoft's marketing muscle, the KM > industry will become legitimized overnight. > > It has been a fairly long night and it seems doubtful even now > that MS Project Cortex can be taken as more than merely a new > beginning, in a proprietary environment. > > On page 12, I quoted Savage as suggesting, "... teams should be > responsible for defining their goals, purpose, and mission - > together with their project plan - in a shareable database." For > public objectives, I now believe that "database" should be the > Internet. See > https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/i-only-had-brain-evolving-prefrontal-core-text-internet-owen-ambur/, > whose title has an amazingly coincidental parallel to MS's new > project. > > Owen > > > On 12/20/2019 1:15 PM, Ronald Reck wrote: >> I am local to DC, I am out of town right now and cant review this thread in detail right now. >> I am happy to contribute and help with delivery. >> >> -Ronald P. Reck >> >> >> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:44:52 +0800, Paola Di Maio<paola.dimaio@gmail.com> <mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks a lot Owen >>> >>> are you local to DC? >>> >>> I think we just need to send the abstract asap >>> then start working on a paper hoping that we can agree on scope and >>> language >>> >>> KR is the way we can hold government guys accountable, we just need to >>> make >>> a compelling case for them. >>> >>> Please feel free to start drafting, glad this resonates with you and >>> hopefully Carl, who had some input in the Taipei talk as well as hopefully >>> others of course, >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:26 PM Owen Ambur<Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> <mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Paola, I am very interested in the use of AI to foster transparency and >>>> accountability in government. While this May 1998 presentation makes no >>>> reference to AI, it is all about records management and accountability is >>>> all about records, preferably maintained and shared in open, standard, >>>> machine-readable format:http://ambur.net/ASIS/KMvalue.html >>>> >>>> As revealed by this Google query >>>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+for+records+management&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS868US868&oq=AI+for+records+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l7.6274j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8> <https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+for+records+management&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS868US868&oq=AI+for+records+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l7.6274j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8>, >>>> AI is now being widely used to support the classification and management of >>>> records. >>>> >>>> For background on machine-readability, see >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document >>>> >>>> See also the closely related provisions of the OPEN Government Data Act >>>> (OGDA): >>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/ >>>> >>>> Here are some of the plans in the StratML collection that reference AI: >>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/C4DINAISwStyle.xml >>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DCGMwStyle.xml >>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DARPAPAIwStyle.xml >>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/NAIRDSPwStyle.xml >>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AI2wStyle.xml >>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/KEwStyle.xml >>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/FRNTwStyle.xml >>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DMwStyle.xml >>>> >>>> It appears that AIIM may take up the cause of KM again, stimulated by MS Project >>>> Cortex<http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSPCwStyle.xml> <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSPCwStyle.xml>. Here are some of >>>> the artifacts generated by AIIM's last pass at that topic, in StratML >>>> format:http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#AIIMKM >>>> >>>> I look forward to learning if this group can crowdsource the preparation >>>> of a proposed presentation making a significant contribution to the >>>> advancement of the cause of transparency and accountability in government >>>> at the International Academy of CIO (IAC) conference in Arlington, >>>> Virginia, on September 28 - 30. >>>> >>>> For those whom may be unfamiliar with that IAC, their about statement is >>>> available in StratML format athttp://stratml.us/carmel/iso/IACTwStyle.xml >>>> In the DC area, this is the IAC more commonly known: >>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IAC >>>> >>>> Owen >>>> >>>> On 12/19/2019 8:45 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote: >>>> >>>> Greetings folks >>>> >>>> There is an opportunity to make the next contribution to the next AICIO >>>> conference in DC >>>> >>>> I would like to attend in person, if possible, and maybe that could be an >>>> opportunity to hangout >>>> together and pitch our work to the CIO community, which is so important >>>> (and so much in need of guidance) >>>> or if I cannot attend, maybe we can have someone local to go and present >>>> >>>> Here is more or les what I have in mind, >>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iZARdPoWeEZzld1iugl5hlaMh7aaYrJkD7SiEycXvdQ/edit?usp=sharing >>>> >>>> if someone is inspired to co author, let's pitch >>>> I think the main challenge is to find agreement on what to say >>>> (for example, Carl Own and myself have so far contributed to this topic on >>>> this list >>>> may have different opinions for the direction of this work, and speak >>>> different languages) >>>> I guess thats part of the mission >>>> >>>> I am also reminding co chairs that we are waitinf for their mission >>>> statements >>>> to proceed with their nominations >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> PDM >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>
Received on Saturday, 21 December 2019 02:29:37 UTC