Re: welcome new members and AI map

Hi,
you may want to refer to the much more solid document (and the map therein) produced on the 18th of December 2018 by the European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence: "A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Scientific Disciplines":
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/definition-artificial-intelligence-main-capabilities-and-scientific-disciplines


cheers
--e.

On 17 Dec 2018, at 08:29, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com<mailto:paoladimaio10@gmail.com>> wrote:

Dear Enrico

nice to hear from you-
thanks for reply

Perhaps then, we could create a better version of this map
How to go about it?

I started a concept map but have not yet finished the required reading
to complete it
this is why I am happy to see someone else mapping the domain, but
not quite sure its correct, comprehensive enough-

What I like is the map and the summary of AI subdomains, which is what
we started here

we can then publish something that could be useful, given that you say
the representation in the article is wrong
we should definitely try to point it out

PDM

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:21 PM Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it<mailto:franconi@inf.unibz.it>> wrote:

On 17 Dec 2018, at 02:04, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com<mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com>> wrote:


if people think this is good enough


It is as bad as I can imagine.
The symbolic and sub-symbolic parts are filled with non-sense, and lack all the relevant parts.
What can we expect from a "tech investor and AI technologist" writing on Forbes?
I don't even believe that the proposed tri-partition is a useful one.
cheers
--e.