Re: welcome new members and AI map

Excellent starting point. But again I object to the "Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to systems designed by humans that,  .....
It stresses anthropocentric thinking. This may sound crazy. But if we model the Reasoning part based on humans we will run into problems.
This I will elaborate upon in a proposition paper that defines categories of uses of AI and the types of entities that are interacting. 
Nevertheless a good starting point. Now let us find similar documents from UNESCO, UN and professional organizations and standard setting organizations as well.
regards
Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development 

    On Friday, December 21, 2018 7:05 AM, Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it> wrote:
 

 Hi,you may want to refer to the much more solid document (and the map therein) produced on the 18th of December 2018 by the European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence: "A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Scientific Disciplines":https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/definition-artificial-intelligence-main-capabilities-and-scientific-disciplines
cheers--e.

On 17 Dec 2018, at 08:29, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Enrico

nice to hear from you-
thanks for reply

Perhaps then, we could create a better version of this map
How to go about it?

I started a concept map but have not yet finished the required reading
to complete it
this is why I am happy to see someone else mapping the domain, but
not quite sure its correct, comprehensive enough-

What I like is the map and the summary of AI subdomains, which is what
we started here

we can then publish something that could be useful, given that you say
the representation in the article is wrong
we should definitely try to point it out

PDM

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:21 PM Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it> wrote:


On 17 Dec 2018, at 02:04, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:


if people think this is good enough


It is as bad as I can imagine.
The symbolic and sub-symbolic parts are filled with non-sense, and lack all the relevant parts.
What can we expect from a "tech investor and AI technologist" writing on Forbes?
I don't even believe that the proposed tri-partition is a useful one.
cheers
--e.