- From: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:29:53 +0800
- To: Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Cc: "public-aikr@w3.org" <public-aikr@w3.org>
Dear Enrico nice to hear from you- thanks for reply Perhaps then, we could create a better version of this map How to go about it? I started a concept map but have not yet finished the required reading to complete it this is why I am happy to see someone else mapping the domain, but not quite sure its correct, comprehensive enough- What I like is the map and the summary of AI subdomains, which is what we started here we can then publish something that could be useful, given that you say the representation in the article is wrong we should definitely try to point it out PDM On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:21 PM Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it> wrote: > > On 17 Dec 2018, at 02:04, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > > > if people think this is good enough > > > It is as bad as I can imagine. > The symbolic and sub-symbolic parts are filled with non-sense, and lack all the relevant parts. > What can we expect from a "tech investor and AI technologist" writing on Forbes? > I don't even believe that the proposed tri-partition is a useful one. > cheers > --e.
Received on Monday, 17 December 2018 13:40:31 UTC