- From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:16:38 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: sequpt <sequpt@protonmail.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2023-12-31, at 18:12, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> wrote:
>
> On 31.12.2023 11:27, sequpt wrote:
>> Hello and thanks for the quick answer.
>> The [HTTP] reference in RFC9112 links to https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9110 and in every version available that I can access at this URL, 5.5 is the section where 'obs-text' is defined. 5.6.3 is 'Whitespace'. This is the first errata I submit, am I missing something important?
>
> 5.6.4 is correct; in doubt see <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.txt>.
This is a weird discussion.
The line
obs-text = %x80-FF
is indeed in Section 5.5 of RFC 9110 (following the above link); the errata report seems to valid to me.
What are you guys seeing?
> My guess is that you're looking at the HTML version, and some misbehaving plugin is breaking the HTML representation; I recall that Martin Thomson had a similar issue a few week ago.
I was looking at .TXT only (but checked with the HTML [1], which has no surprises here).
Grüße, Carsten
[1]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#section-5.5-2
Received on Sunday, 31 December 2023 18:16:47 UTC