Re: Call for adoption: draft-nottingham-http-cache-groups

I'm in support of adoption to shake out the details.

I don't know that it makes sense for client caches to do anything with it
but I can see where a standard way to flush portions of intermediary caches
would simplify building apps that work across CDNs. At least on the Chrome
side, our caches are keyed by URL and purging by something like a group
would either be slow (with a full scan) or require a rewrite of the
indexing.  All good things to discuss in the wg though.

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:42 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:

> Hello HTTP WG,
>
> This email starts a call for adoption
> for draft-nottingham-http-cache-groups, which was presented and discussed
> at the IETF 117 meeting.
>
> The current version of the document is here:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-http-cache-groups-00.html
>
> Please review the document and reply with your reviews and thoughts on if
> this is something this WG should take on.
>
> This call will last until *Monday, October 30*.
>
> Best,
> Tommy
>