- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 07:09:21 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 11.04.2023 16:01, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 11.04.2023 13:00, RFC Errata System wrote: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9110, >> "HTTP Semantics". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7419 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Dave Shawley <daveshawley@gmail.com> >> >> Section: 8.3.2 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> In the fields defined by this document, charset names appear either >> in parameters (Content-Type), or, for Accept-Encoding, in the form of >> a plain token. >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> In the fields defined by this document, charset names appear either >> in parameters (Content-Type), or, for Accept-Charset, in the form of >> a plain token. >> >> Notes >> ----- >> Accept-Encoding is the preferred list of response content codings. >> Accept-Charset is the preferred list of response charsets. >> ... > > Correct. This is an error in the spec. > > Best regards, Julian I don't see any subsequent discussion (except for <https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/1101> where Roy agrees). I believe this is an actual erratum and should be set to "verified". Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 23 October 2023 05:09:43 UTC